Asked by Tiffany McClendon on Apr 26, 2024
Verified
In Baker v. Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled which of the following decisions?
A) The Court set aside the decision and ordered another hearing be held since there was a reasonable apprehension of bias.
B) The Court set aside the decision because the hearing had violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
C) The Court confirmed the decision because the immigration officer had acted appropriately.
D) The Court confirmed the decision because the process followed by the hearing was proper in the circumstances.
E) The Court declined to hear the case because Courts have no authority review board decisions.
Reasonable Apprehension
A perception or fear of bias or prejudice that appears fair or sensible to an unbiased observer.
Bias
A preconceived opinion or inclination that is not based on reason or actual experience, leading to unfair judgments or decisions.
Supreme Court of Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in Canada, serving as the final court of appeal and deciding on issues of national importance.
- Understand the purpose and boundaries of judicial review in the context of administrative law.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Understand the purpose and boundaries of judicial review in the context of administrative law.
Related questions
Joe Approached a Provincial Government Clerk and Applied to Renew ...
A Privative Clause Is Which of the Following ...
Which of the Following Is False with Regard to Administrative ...
Which of the Following Statements Regarding Administrative Law Is True ...
What Constitutes Fair Treatment Will Vary with the Circumstances, but ...