Asked by Harry Nayan on May 02, 2024
Verified
Interference with economic relations is actionable even where no breach of contract has taken place, but
A) there must be some other unlawful conduct associated with the complaint, such as bribery or defamation.
B) there must be some instance of negligence associated with the complaint, such as a product liability claim.
C) the conduct complained of must have been unintentional, otherwise the action will not succeed.
D) the conduct complained of must not have resulted in actual harm, otherwise the action will not succeed.
E) no damages can be awarded in such an action.
Unlawful Conduct
Actions or behavior that are illegal or not permitted by law.
Economic Relations
The interactions and interdependencies between economic agents, including countries, organizations, and individuals, as they engage in production, exchange, and consumption of goods and services.
- Recognize the judicial ramifications for particular tortious acts, notably inducement and meddling in economic interactions.
Verified Answer
AF
alexa forteMay 09, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
Interference with economic relations, also known as tortious interference, is actionable when it involves unlawful conduct such as bribery or defamation. This means that the interference must involve some form of wrongful action beyond mere competition or lawful business practices.
Learning Objectives
- Recognize the judicial ramifications for particular tortious acts, notably inducement and meddling in economic interactions.
Related questions
Where Two or More Persons Act Together Using Unlawful Means ...
For an Intentional Tort to Occur, the Plaintiff Must Show ...
Which Statement Is True Regarding the Intent Required for an ...
Which of the Following Is True Regarding the Tort of ...
Which of the Following Is a Correct Statement Regarding the ...