Asked by Keely Messer on May 03, 2024
Verified
The doctrine of unconscionability has evolved through its application by the courts to include:
A) contract negotiating procedures and good faith.
B) substantive contract terms and duress.
C) good faith and freedom of contract.
D) contract negotiating procedures and substantive contract terms .
Unconscionability
A contract term that is so unjust or overwhelmingly one-sided in favor of the party who has the superior bargaining power.
Contract Negotiating Procedures
The systematic steps and methods used during the process of reaching an agreement on contractual terms.
- Comprehend the principle of unconscionability as it is outlined in the Uniform Commercial Code, covering its varieties and implications for contractual agreements.
Verified Answer
ZK
Zybrea KnightMay 04, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
The doctrine of unconscionability addresses issues related to both the process of negotiating a contract (procedural unconscionability) and the actual terms of the contract itself (substantive unconscionability). This includes unfair or overly harsh terms as well as imbalances in the negotiation process.
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the principle of unconscionability as it is outlined in the Uniform Commercial Code, covering its varieties and implications for contractual agreements.
Related questions
Which of the Following Is True Regarding Unconscionability Under the ...
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)allows the Court to Modify or ...
Under the Doctrine of Unconscionability, Courts Would Refuse to Grant the ...
Substantive Unconscionability Involves Scrutiny by the Court for Bargaining Naughtiness
Which of the Following Is an Example of Substantive Unconscionability ...