Asked by Faith Schier on May 08, 2024
Verified
Kant proposed that the rule against lying is a ______.
A) categorical imperative
B) hypothetical imperative
C) ethical imperative
D) moral imperative
Categorical Imperative
A fundamental principle in the ethical philosophy of Immanuel Kant that requires that individuals act in a manner in which they wish their actions to become universal laws.
Ethical Imperative
A strong moral obligation or duty which compels someone to act in a certain way based on ethical considerations.
- Attain insight into Kant's ethical philosophy, specifically regarding the categorical imperative.
- Identify the differences between categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives.
Verified Answer
CG
Courtney GarzaMay 12, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
Kant believed that moral principles should be based on reason and logical consistency rather than subjective desires or consequences. The categorical imperative is a moral rule that applies to all rational beings, regardless of their personal preferences or circumstances. Kant argued that lying violates the categorical imperative because it treats others as mere means to an end, rather than respecting their innate dignity and autonomy. Thus, the rule against lying is a categorical imperative, according to Kant.
Learning Objectives
- Attain insight into Kant's ethical philosophy, specifically regarding the categorical imperative.
- Identify the differences between categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives.
Related questions
Kant Argued That the Moral Law Is an Expression of ...
The Test for the Categorical Imperative Is Whether an Individual ...
Because Lies Can Sometimes Result in Greater Good Than Harm,Kant ...
Kant's Emphasis on Absolute Moral Rules Does Not Provide a ...
Kant Argues That We Have a Prima Facie Duty to ...