Asked by Jessica Redding on May 10, 2024

verifed

Verified

Sandamali had been running a business in a small municipality for a number of years. She wasn't always up to date on the relevant legal issues facing her business, but she always acted ethically and treated her customers well. After a number of notices from the municipality went unanswered, Sandamali had her business licence withdrawn. Which of the following would not be grounds upon which she might challenge the decision?

A) The legislation was intra vires.
B) The regulations relied on were not authorized by statute.
C) The legislation was an attempt by the provincial government to pass criminal law legislation under the guise of a provincial power.
D) The legislation was invalid under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
E) The provincial government did not have authority to pass the legislation under section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

Intra Vires

Within the powers; an action taken by an entity that is within the scope of its legal authority.

Charter of Rights

A formal document outlining the fundamental freedoms and rights of the citizens, typically protected by law against government infringement.

Provincial Government

The government of a province or state, responsible for governing regional-specific laws and policies.

  • Master the underlying principles of the Canadian legal system, focusing on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and administrative law.
verifed

Verified Answer

SJ
sandy jeronimoMay 12, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
The term "intra vires" means within the powers of the body that enacted the legislation, implying that the legislation was properly enacted within the legal authority of the municipality or relevant government body. Therefore, arguing that the legislation was intra vires would not be a ground to challenge the decision, as it suggests the legislation was valid and within legal authority.