Asked by Justice Johnson on May 21, 2024

verifed

Verified

Which of the following is true regarding the effect of a debtor offering to pay a different type of payment, for example, goods instead of money, on a debt for which there is not a dispute over the amount or existence of the debt, and the creditor agrees?

A) A liquidated debt is involved, and there is an accord and satisfaction.
B) A liquidated debt is involved, and there is an accord but no satisfaction.
C) A liquidated debt is involved, and there is not a satisfaction or an accord.
D) An unliquidated debt is involved, and there is an accord and satisfaction.
E) An unliquidated debt is involved, and there is an accord but not satisfaction.

Liquidated Debt

A debt for which the exact monetary value has been determined and acknowledged by all parties involved.

Accord And Satisfaction

Accord and Satisfaction is a legal agreement between parties to settle a dispute by agreeing on a payment that is different from what was originally owed.

Unliquidated Debt

A debt for which the exact amount has not been determined.

  • Acquire knowledge of the primary legal frameworks applicable to resolving conflicts over debt settlements, focusing on the distinction between determinate and indeterminate debts, along with concord and contentment.
verifed

Verified Answer

SJ
Sapna JaiswalMay 28, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
When a debtor offers to pay a different type of payment (e.g., goods instead of money) on a debt that is not disputed, and the creditor agrees, it involves a liquidated debt. The agreement to accept a different form of payment constitutes an "accord," and the actual acceptance of this different payment fulfills the "satisfaction" part, thus resolving the debt.