Asked by Madison Garneau on Jun 02, 2024

verifed

Verified

Many of the experimental participants who were asked how fast two cars in a filmed traffic accident were going when they smashed into each other subsequently recalled seeing broken glass at the scene of the accident. This experiment best illustrated

A) proactive interference.
B) mnemonic devices.
C) the spacing effect.
D) the misinformation effect.

Misinformation Effect

The phenomenon where a person's recall of episodic memories becomes less accurate because of post-event information.

Broken Glass

Typically refers to glass that has been shattered or fractured, often symbolizing damage or destruction.

Mnemonic Devices

Strategies a person can adopt to better their capacity for remembering information.

  • Understand the effects of external recommendations and inaccuracies on the recollection and formation of memories.
verifed

Verified Answer

HM
Hannah MarcotteJun 06, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
The experiment described in the question is a classic demonstration of the misinformation effect, which refers to the distortion of memory that occurs when people are exposed to misleading information after an event. In this case, the misinformation (i.e. the question about broken glass) led participants to recall information that was not actually present in the original event. Proactive interference refers to the interference that occurs when previously learned information makes it difficult to remember new information, mnemonic devices are memory aids used to enhance recall, and the spacing effect refers to the phenomenon that we tend to remember information better when it is presented over spaced intervals rather than all at once. None of these concepts are directly relevant to the experiment described in the question.