Asked by Ariana Rinehart on Jun 07, 2024
Verified
In Symons v.Heaton,the case in the text,the court held that:
A) Symons' unjust enrichment claim was successful because Plachek received a benefit from Symons.
B) Symons' unjust enrichment claim failed because,among other things,Symons never expected payment and took care of Plachek because he was his friend.
C) an implied in fact contract existed based on the parties' conduct.
D) an implied in fact contract existed because Plachek told Symons that he wanted him to have his estate when he died.
Unjust Enrichment
A legal principle that prevents one party from gaining a benefit at another's expense without compensation.
Implied in Fact Contract
An agreement inferred from the actions, behavior, or circumstances of the parties involved, rather than written or spoken words.
- Acquire knowledge of the remedies applicable to breaches of contracts and disagreements over contracts.
Verified Answer
JC
Jonathan CastroJun 12, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The court held that Symons' unjust enrichment claim failed because,among other things,Symons never expected payment and took care of Plachek because he was his friend.
Learning Objectives
- Acquire knowledge of the remedies applicable to breaches of contracts and disagreements over contracts.