Asked by Bernardo Waincier on Jun 12, 2024
Verified
The Supreme Court's decision in King v.Burwell (2015) was significant because it
A) dramatically reduced Congress's power to regulate the health care market under the interstate commerce clause.
B) upheld the "individual mandate" provision of the Affordable Care Act.
C) struck down the "individual mandate" provision of the Affordable Care Act.
D) ensured that federal subsidies to help pay for health insurance would be available to residents in all states.
Federal Subsidies
Federal subsidies are financial support and assistance provided by the federal government to organizations, businesses, and individuals in various sectors, including agriculture, health care, and energy, to support public policy objectives.
Interstate Commerce Clause
A provision in the U.S. Constitution granting Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states.
Individual Mandate
A requirement, initially part of the Affordable Care Act, that required individuals to have health insurance or face a penalty, intended to ensure that everyone is covered by health insurance.
- Evaluate the function of the Supreme Court in analyzing laws pertaining to federalism and health care policies.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Evaluate the function of the Supreme Court in analyzing laws pertaining to federalism and health care policies.
Related questions
The Supreme Court Justices Determined That the Individual Mandate Found ...
Who Wrote the Supreme Court Opinions in Both McCulloch V ...
Why Was United States V.Lopez (1995)important ...
Which Statement Best Describes the Supreme Court's Decisions About Federalism ...
A Provision of Which Law Was Overturned in the Supreme ...