Asked by Bryanna Brace on Jun 30, 2024
Verified
Which of the following would always be considered to be contrary to public policy?
A) A contract which contains a covenant not to compete.
B) A contract offered on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.
C) An agreement to pay someone to make false statements about a competitor's product.
D) An agreement which contains an exculpatory clause.
Public Policy
Government policies developed to address issues of public concern, influenced by the public's values and goals.
Exculpatory Clause
A clause in a contract that exempts a party from responsibility for any damages that occur while the contract is being carried out.
False Statements
A statement that is not true or does not accurately reflect reality.
- Identify arrangements and contracts that breach legal boundaries and oppose public interests.
Verified Answer
ZK
Zybrea KnightJul 03, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
An agreement to pay someone to make false statements about a competitor's product is always considered to be contrary to public policy because it involves committing an act of fraud or defamation, which is illegal and harmful to the public interest.
Learning Objectives
- Identify arrangements and contracts that breach legal boundaries and oppose public interests.