Asked by Michael Hoffman on Jul 02, 2024
Verified
In Milgram's research on obedience
A) participants thought they were shocking someone else, although they really weren't.
B) participants did not think they were administering shock to someone else, although they actually were.
C) the "learner" was a real participant, while the "teacher" was a confederate of the experimenter.
D) teachers who refused to shock learners were threatened with shock themselves.
Administering Shock
A research method often used in psychological studies to investigate how individuals respond to pain or discomfort provided by electrical shocks in controlled settings.
- Identify the traits and consequences of adherence to authority, along with the circumstances that facilitate its occurrence.
Verified Answer
AT
Abdel TaylorJul 03, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
Participants were told that they were administering electric shocks to a "learner" who was actually a confederate of the experimenter. In reality, the learner was not actually receiving any shocks, but participants believed they were.
Learning Objectives
- Identify the traits and consequences of adherence to authority, along with the circumstances that facilitate its occurrence.
Related questions
In Milgram's Experiment on Obedience to Authority, Most of the ...
In the Milgram Experiment, the Teacher Heard the Learner Beg ...
________ Is Compliance in Response to the Command from Another ...
Based on Findings from Milgram's Obedience Studies,participants Would Be Less ...
Which of the Following Conclusions Did Milgram Derive from His ...