Asked by Braxton Terrazas on Jul 08, 2024
Verified
The court in Weil v.Murray,the case in the text,found that the buyer accepted the painting.Which of the following is not one of the reasons the court used to reach this conclusion?
A) Murray kept the painting after a reasonable opportunity for inspection passed.
B) Murray proposed a counteroffer,which Weil unequivocally accepted.
C) Murray permitted the painting to be cleaned.
D) Murray permitted the painting to be restored.
Reasonable Opportunity
A circumstance where an individual or party is given a fair and sufficient chance to undertake an action or fulfill an obligation.
Counteroffer
A reply to a proposal where the initial conditions are declined and alternative conditions are suggested.
Accepted Painting
An artwork that has been officially received or approved, often in the context of submissions to a gallery or competition.
- Grasp how legal cases illustrate practical applications of sales law concepts.
Verified Answer
CB
CLINTON BrooksJul 15, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The court found,among other things,that Murray accepted the painting because he (1)kept it after a reasonable opportunity for inspection passed, (2)permitted it to be cleaned,and (3)permitted it to be restored.
Learning Objectives
- Grasp how legal cases illustrate practical applications of sales law concepts.