Asked by Elijah Jenkins on Jul 14, 2024
Verified
The basic reason that research on the accuracy of personality judgments experienced a lengthy hiatus between 1955 and the mid-1980s was that
A) early researchers had already identified the characteristics of a good judge of personality.
B) researchers turned their attention to the content of personality judgments.
C) researchers lacked consensual criteria for deciding the accuracy of personality judgments.
D) early research indicated that personality judgments are relatively inconsequential.
Consensual Criteria
The agreement among researchers or judges on the standards used to evaluate or judge something, ensuring consistent and objective assessment.
Accuracy Of Personality Judgments
Refers to how precisely people can assess others' personalities, often influenced by their observations, the contexts, and their biases.
- Pinpoint the influences on the accuracy of deducing personality traits.
Verified Answer
AT
Abhinav TariyalJul 15, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
The hiatus in research on the accuracy of personality judgments between 1955 and the mid-1980s was primarily due to researchers lacking consensual criteria for deciding the accuracy of these judgments. This uncertainty about how to measure or define accuracy led to a pause in research efforts in this area.
Learning Objectives
- Pinpoint the influences on the accuracy of deducing personality traits.
Related questions
What Does Recent Research Suggest About the Validity of First ...
Which Was NOT One of the Areas in Which People ...
Which of the Following Was NOT Mentioned in the Textbook ...
A Variable That Affects the Relation Between Two Other Variables ...
Which of the Following Is an Example of Predictive Validity ...