Asked by Amelia Bishop on Jul 15, 2024
Verified
Third-party intervention should be avoided
A) when passions are high.
B) when the parties are at an impasse on the issues.
C) when progress is occurring or is likely to occur.
D) when the parties are unable to move the process beyond a particular sticking point.
E) Third party intervention should be avoided in all of the above situations.
Third-party Intervention
In the context of disputes or negotiations, this refers to the involvement of an external party to help resolve the issue or mediate.
Passions High
Situations in which emotions and personal stakes are elevated, often impacting the rationality and objectivity of the individuals involved.
- Ascertain the circumstances in which third-party mediation is justifiable or compulsory.
Verified Answer
AS
Austin SmithJul 16, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
Third-party intervention should be avoided when progress is occurring or is likely to occur. This is because third-party intervention may disrupt the progress and momentum of the negotiations or mediation. It is generally better for the parties to continue to make progress on their own without the involvement of a third party. In situations where progress is not being made or the parties are stuck on a particular issue, third-party intervention may be necessary to help move the process forward.
Learning Objectives
- Ascertain the circumstances in which third-party mediation is justifiable or compulsory.
Related questions
Research Suggests That When Parties Are Pressured or Required to ...
As a Rule of Thumb,interventions That Are Not Sanctioned by ...
____________ Is the Most Common Form of Third-Party Intervention That ...
When Negotiators Have Tried All Other Options and Are Not ...
Even If the Relationship Between the Parties Is So Damaged ...