Asked by Katelyn Tilden on Jul 18, 2024

verifed

Verified

If a statute is found to be applicable to a fact situation, then the courts will hold that an unexcused violation of that statute which causes an injury to another is:

A) strict liability.
B) res ipsa loquitur.
C) negligence per se.
D) assumption of the risk.

Negligence Per Se

A legal doctrine where an action is considered negligent because it violates a statute or regulation designed to protect the public.

Strict Liability

A legal principle that holds a party responsible for damages or losses, regardless of fault or intent.

Unexcused Violation

A breach of rules or laws where the offender has no justifiable reason or excuse for their actions.

  • Understand the core principles and applications of negligence law, including the negligence per se doctrine.
verifed

Verified Answer

JT
Jodyne TriplettJul 25, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
Negligence per se is a legal doctrine whereby an act is considered negligent because it violates a statute (law). When a statute that is designed to protect against a certain type of harm is violated and causes that type of harm to occur, courts often consider the violation as negligence per se. This means the act of violating the statute is automatically considered to be negligent, without the need to prove the duty of care and breach elements typically required in negligence cases.