Asked by Kristen Lambert on Sep 23, 2024
Verified
In a study,conducted by Schulz-Hardt,Frey,Lüthgens,and Moscovici (2000) ,both individuals and groups were given a case study involving a chemical company that had to make the decision of whether or not to invest in a developing country.After making an initial decision,all participants were given a chance to receive additional pieces of information that either favored or opposed investment in the developing country.The results showed that
A) individuals but not groups demonstrated a clear preference for additional information that supported the initial decision they had made
B) groups but not individuals demonstrated a clear preference for additional information that supported the initial decision they had made
C) both individuals and groups demonstrated a clear preference for additional information that supported the initial decision they had made
D) both individuals and groups demonstrated a clear preference for additional information that opposed the initial decision they had made
Additional Information
Supplementary data or facts that provide further insight or context to a subject matter.
- Comprehend the mechanisms behind decision-making in groups and the elements that affect it.
Verified Answer
PJ
punyaa juneja6 days ago
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
The study found that both individuals and groups demonstrated a clear preference for information that supported their initial decision. Therefore, the correct answer is C, which states that both individuals and groups demonstrated a clear preference for additional information that supported the initial decision they had made.
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the mechanisms behind decision-making in groups and the elements that affect it.