Asked by Mahmood Hallak on Apr 28, 2024
Verified
A landmark California court case, Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, dramatically affected the right to confidentiality between client and therapist. This case led to the conclusion that:
A) confidentiality may never be broken, even if there is a clear danger to an identifiable person.
B) a therapist must break the obligation of confidentiality if there is a clear danger to a specific identifiable person.
C) confidentiality must not be broken simply to protect a person who may be in close proximity to an intended victim.
D) a therapist must break the obligation of confidentiality if there is the potential that the person may hurt someone, even if a particular victim has not been identified.
Tarasoff v. Regents
A landmark legal case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.
Confidentiality
The ethical principle that a practitioner or professional must not disclose information about a client without the client's consent.
Therapist
A healthcare professional specialized in providing treatments and strategies to help individuals cope with mental, emotional, or behavioral issues.
- Comprehend the sophisticated aspects of maintaining secrecy while weighing the duty to shield others.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the sophisticated aspects of maintaining secrecy while weighing the duty to shield others.
Related questions
Which Principle Is MOST Likely to Result in a Conflict ...
If a Client Tells the Lawyer That He or She ...
The General Duty of Confidentiality Is Broader Than the Lawyer-Client ...
_____ Is the Privacy Principle That Refers to Restricting the ...
Explain How Today's Methods of Electronic Communication Can Pose Possible ...