Asked by Taylor Eakin on Jul 04, 2024
Verified
A principal is not liable for an agent's crime if the agent commits a crime in the scope of employment for the principal without the authorization of the principal.
Agent's Crime
Illegal acts committed by an individual (agent) acting on behalf of another party.
Scope of Employment
The range of activities an employee is reasonably expected to do as part of their job.
Principal
A person or entity who authorizes another (the agent) to act on their behalf, often in a legal or business context.
- Acquire knowledge on the notion of vicarious liability and the specific situations that warrant its imposition.
Verified Answer
SV
Stacey VernerJul 09, 2024
Final Answer :
True
Explanation :
A principal is generally not liable for the criminal acts of an agent if those acts were committed outside the scope of the agent's authority and without the principal's authorization.
Learning Objectives
- Acquire knowledge on the notion of vicarious liability and the specific situations that warrant its imposition.
Related questions
When an Employee Commits a Tort in the Process of ...
The Term That Is Used in Tort Law to Describe ...
Explain the Principle of Vicarious Liability and Give an Example
Explain Any Limitation on the Principle of Vicarious Liability in ...
Explain What Is Meant by Vicarious Liability in the Employment ...