Asked by Megan Shanahan on Sep 29, 2024
According to Chapter 2, ethicists such as Manuel Velasquez (2011) argue that whistle-blowing is justified if three conditions are satisfied. One condition is that there is strong evidence that the organization is doing something that is hurting or will hurt other parties. What is one other condition?
A) The employee has made a serious attempt to resolve the problem through internal channels.
B) The employee can be reasonably certain he or she will not be penalized for whistle-blowing.
C) The employee has suffered personal harm as a result of the wrongdoing, such as the loss of a promotion, a substantial decrease in salary, or physical injury.
D) The wrongdoing involves members of a minority group or affects individuals granted specific rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Manuel Velasquez
Manuel Velasquez is an individual's name and without further context, it isn't possible to provide a relevant definition.
Whistle-Blowing
The act of exposing any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organization.
- Understand the standards and conditions that justify whistle-blowing according to ethicists.
Learning Objectives
- Understand the standards and conditions that justify whistle-blowing according to ethicists.
Related questions
Melinda Observes Her Boss Using His Company Credit Card to ...
Ariana Is Engaging in Whistle Blowing When She Informs Top ...
In Order for Whistle-Blowing to Be Effective ...
Because Some Employees Will View Whistleblowing as an Act of ...
The Text Specifically Discusses That Failure to Reprimand Staff for ...