Asked by Corinna Ragsdale on May 09, 2024

verifed

Verified

Although there are some key differences, grievance arbitration closely resembles:

A) Mediation
B) A formal judicial process
C) Bilateral negotiations
D) Tripartite negotiations

Grievance Arbitration

A process where a neutral third party makes a binding decision regarding a dispute between an employee and employer over the application or interpretation of a labor agreement.

Judicial Process

The series of steps and procedures followed in the legal system, including litigation and adjudication in courts.

Bilateral Negotiations

A negotiation process involving two parties directly interacting to reach an agreement or resolve disputes, without involving intermediaries.

  • Grasp the end goals, advantages, and organization of grievance approaches, along with its significance in improving workplace conflict resolution methods.
verifed

Verified Answer

JB
Jeffery BakerMay 11, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Grievance arbitration resembles a formal judicial process, as it involves presenting evidence and arguments to a neutral third party (the arbitrator) who makes a final and binding decision. While mediation, bilateral negotiations, and tripartite negotiations all involve third-party assistance, they do not typically result in a legally binding decision.