Asked by Zixin Zhang on Apr 27, 2024
Verified
Arthur contracts to sell Ben his house for $100,000.Later the parties modify the contract by changing the price to $110,000.All other terms remain the same.Why is there no consideration for the second agreement? State two ways in which the parties can circumvent this problem.
Consideration
Something of value exchanged between parties in a contract, required for the contract to be legally binding.
Contract Modification
Any change or alteration made to the terms of a contract, agreed upon by all parties involved.
Price Change
The fluctuation in the selling price of goods or services over a period of time.
- Comprehend the legal treatment of contract modifications in relation to consideration.
Verified Answer
DW
Dylan WalterApr 29, 2024
Final Answer :
There is no consideration because Arthur is not giving Ben any legal value for Ben's promise to pay Arthur $110,000.Instead,Arthur is merely promising to perform a preexisting contractual obligation.One way to avoid this problem is for the parties to mutually agree to terminate the first contract before making the new contract.The second is for Arthur to promise to give Ben something additional,however slight,in the second contract.Since the law does not inquire into the adequacy of consideration,this something additional (however slight)will be legal value.
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the legal treatment of contract modifications in relation to consideration.
Related questions
In the Case in the Text,Franchise Holding II,LLC V ...
Sam Owed Joe $6000 Due January 12, 2017 ...
Which of the Following Is True of Consideration ...
The Rule on Adequacy of Consideration Reflects the Laissez-Faire Assumption ...
Historically,free Promises Were Not Enforced Unless They Had Which of ...