Asked by DYLAN HOLLOWAY on May 06, 2024
Verified
As demonstrated in Sekhar v.United States,the case in the text,courts carefully scrutinize,and narrowly construe criminal statutes in an effort to:
A) make certain whether a defendant's acts were prohibited by the legislature.
B) understand why the legislature banned certain acts.
C) determine the proper sentence.
D) rewrite the statutes for clarity.
Criminal Statutes
Laws or regulations stipulating behaviors that are forbidden and can lead to punishment by the government if violated.
Legislature
A governmental body with the power to make, amend, and repeal laws within a certain jurisdiction.
- Grasp the principles of statutory interpretation, especially in criminal law.
Verified Answer
AM
Aaron McFallMay 08, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
Courts carefully scrutinize,and narrowly construe,criminal statutes in an effort to make certain that they sweep in only those behaviors specifically prohibited by the relevant legislature.In Sekhar v.United States,the U.S.Supreme Court conducts such an examination of the Hobbs Act in order to determine whether the defendant's actions constituted extortion in violation of that federal statute.
Learning Objectives
- Grasp the principles of statutory interpretation, especially in criminal law.
Related questions
Which of the Following Is Not Required for a Plaintiff ...
What Do Courts Begin Their Interpretation of a Clearly Worded ...
________ Are General Rules of Thumb Employed in Statutory Interpretations
When a Statute Uses the Word May, This Means That ...
How Does a Court Determine the Legislative Intent of a ...