Asked by Charity Rutter on May 14, 2024
Verified
Corey was serving on a jury in a criminal case,and the jury reached a unanimous "not guilty" verdict.Several months later,some additional evidence came to light that strongly suggested that the defendant was,in fact,guilty of the crime in question.Corey is still not convinced by the new evidence,and claims he wouldn't have voted guilty,even if the new information had been presented during the trial.What is Corey demonstrating in this example
A) conjunction fallacy
B) mental set
C) belief perseverance
D) availability heuristic
Additional Evidence
Supplementary information or data that supports or clarifies an argument, claim, or hypothesis.
Belief Perseverance
A cognitive phenomenon where individuals stick to their initial beliefs even when faced with new, contradictory evidence.
Unanimous Verdict
A legal decision where all jurors agree on the verdict in a court case.
- Understand and delineate the consequences of cognitive biases on perception and the process of making decisions.
Verified Answer
CN
Chris NelsonMay 18, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
Corey is demonstrating belief perseverance, which is the cognitive bias where individuals hold onto their beliefs or attitudes, even in the face of evidence that contradicts those beliefs or attitudes. Despite the new evidence, Corey is still sticking to his original belief that the defendant was not guilty.
Learning Objectives
- Understand and delineate the consequences of cognitive biases on perception and the process of making decisions.
Related questions
What Is a Result of Having a Confirmation Bias ...
Which of the Following Is an Explanation for the Fundamental ...
A Tendency to Weigh Instances of Negative Behavior More Heavily ...
Which of the Following Is NOT a Reason Why People ...
Tendencies to Acquire and Process Information in an Error-Prone Way ...