Asked by maria alvarado on Apr 28, 2024
Verified
Dr.Arnold conducted a study where he found significant results.Dr.Bernhardt found those results interesting,and he conducted the same study in his own lab but did not find significant results.After discussing their results at a conference,the two researchers found a few minor differences between their procedures that could explain their different results.This led to the development of new theories.What aspect of scientific evaluation is depicted in this series of events
A) peer-reviewed publication
B) experimenter bias
C) meta-analysis
D) replication
Replication
The process of repeating a study or experiment to verify its findings or to ensure the reliability of the results.
Experimenter Bias
A form of bias introduced by the experimenter whose expectations about the outcome of the experiment can potentially influence the results.
- Grasp the importance of replication and peer review in scientific research.
Verified Answer
SI
sarah ismaelMay 03, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
This series of events depicts the aspect of replication, where Dr. Bernhardt attempted to replicate Dr. Arnold's study but found different results. Through discussing their procedures, they were able to identify differences that could have led to the different results and develop new theories.
Learning Objectives
- Grasp the importance of replication and peer review in scientific research.
Related questions
Psychology Researchers Publish the Results of Their Studies So That ...
When Mr Arthur, a Researcher, Submits a Paper to a ...
______ Consists of Qualified Researchers with Similar Interests Assessing Each ...
If There Are a Lot of Conflicting Results on a ...
What Type of Studies Involves the Repetition of a Study ...