Asked by Daunette Bodie on May 25, 2024
Verified
During the late nineteenth century,the equal protection clause was
A) severely limited in scope by the Supreme Court.
B) ruled unconstitutional.
C) more strongly defended by individual states than by the federal government.
D) not implemented because of a lack of tax revenue.
Equal Protection Clause
A provision in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution asserting that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Supreme Court
The apex judicial authority in the U.S., tasked with ensuring the American legal system adheres to the Constitution.
- Recognize the evolving interpretation and scope of the equal protection clause.
Verified Answer
CF
Casandra FrancoisMay 29, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
During the late nineteenth century, the Supreme Court severely limited the scope of the equal protection clause through decisions such as Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which established the "separate but equal" doctrine and upheld racial segregation. This allowed for widespread discrimination against African Americans and other minorities.
Learning Objectives
- Recognize the evolving interpretation and scope of the equal protection clause.
Related questions
Some Observers Claim That the Supreme Court's Decision in Parents ...
The Ruling in Plessy V.Ferguson (1896) ...
Legally Enforced Segregation in Public Schools Is a Form of ...
When Racial Segregation in Schools Is the Result of Housing ...
Classifications Based on Age and Sex Are Examples of Suspect ...