Asked by anand paypal on Jun 14, 2024
Verified
Dylan applies for a position with Electrical Works LLC. Dylan's previous employer, Federal Circuits Inc., gives Electrical Works a review of Dylan that includes negative statements Federal Circuits knows are untrue. This is
A) defamation.
B) not defamation because Dylan was employed by Federal Circuits.
C) not defamation because Dylan was not employed by Electrical Works.
D) not defamation because the review was not published.
Defamation
The act of damaging someone's good reputation by making false statements about them.
Negative Statements
Declarations emphasizing what is not true or what will not happen, often used in legal contexts to limit or define obligations.
Untrue
A term typically referring to information or statements that are false or not in accordance with the facts.
- Recognize the components necessary to establish a case of defamation and the arguments that can counter such accusations.
Verified Answer
SK
Samira KadryJun 16, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
Defamation involves making false statements about someone that can harm their reputation. In this case, Federal Circuits Inc. knowingly made untrue negative statements about Dylan, which constitutes defamation regardless of his employment status with either company.
Learning Objectives
- Recognize the components necessary to establish a case of defamation and the arguments that can counter such accusations.
Related questions
To Prove Actual Malice in a Defamation Claim,the Plaintiff Must ...
In a Conversation,Donna Falsely Tells Wendy That Paul Has Krabbe ...
Which of the Following Is Not an Example of Slander ...
If Something Is Considered Defamation Per Se It Means That ...
If a Statement Is Made with Either Knowledge of Falsity ...