Asked by Chris Francisco on Jun 19, 2024
Verified
Explain the cosmological, ontological, and design arguments and the moral proof for God's existence. Do these arguments share any points in common? How do they differ? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each kind of argument? Develop one objection to each of the arguments. Which of the arguments seems the strongest and why?
Cosmological Argument
An argument (or set of arguments) that undertakes to prove that God exists on the basis of the idea that there must have been a first cause or an ultimate reason for the existence of the universe (the cosmos).
Ontological
Having to do with the idea of existence or reality.
Design Arguments
Arguments for the existence of God based on the premise that the universe's complexity and functionality suggest it was designed by an intelligent cause.
- Scrutinize and judge the arguments presented in favor and against the concept of God, with emphasis on the ontological argument, the challenge of evil, and intellectual arguments in defense.
- Foster the ability to critically analyze theological and philosophical rationales within religious contexts.
Verified Answer
RA
Rebecca AliceJun 25, 2024
Final Answer :
Students should be able to explain the differences between these three argumentative strategies and show their strengths and weaknesses.
Learning Objectives
- Scrutinize and judge the arguments presented in favor and against the concept of God, with emphasis on the ontological argument, the challenge of evil, and intellectual arguments in defense.
- Foster the ability to critically analyze theological and philosophical rationales within religious contexts.