Give an example of each of these decisional "sins": commission,omission,imprecision.

Decision-making "sins" refer to common errors that individuals make when they are making decisions. These errors can lead to suboptimal outcomes and can be categorized into different types, such as sins of commission, omission, and imprecision. Here are examples of each:

1. Sin of Commission:
A sin of commission occurs when a decision is made that results in a negative outcome due to an action that was taken. This type of error is associated with doing something that one should not have done.

Example: A marketing manager decides to launch a new advertising campaign without properly researching the target audience. The campaign ends up being offensive to that audience, leading to a public relations disaster and a loss of sales. The manager's decision to go ahead with the campaign without adequate research is a sin of commission.

2. Sin of Omission:
A sin of omission happens when a decision leads to a negative outcome because of inaction or failure to do something that should have been done.

Example: A financial advisor fails to diversify a client's investment portfolio, sticking only to stocks without considering bonds or other asset classes. When the stock market experiences a downturn, the client's portfolio suffers significant losses. The advisor's failure to diversify, which would have potentially mitigated the losses, is a sin of omission.

3. Sin of Imprecision:
A sin of imprecision occurs when a decision is made with insufficient or vague information, leading to an outcome that is not optimal or is flawed due to the lack of clarity.

Example: A project manager estimates the time required to complete a project without conducting a detailed analysis of the tasks involved. The estimate turns out to be overly optimistic, causing the project to run over budget and miss deadlines. The manager's imprecise estimation is a sin of imprecision, as it led to poor planning and project management.

In each of these examples, the decision-maker could have avoided the negative outcome by taking a different approach: in the case of commission, by being more cautious and doing more research; in the case of omission, by being more proactive and thorough; and in the case of imprecision, by seeking out more accurate and detailed information before making a decision.