Asked by Jeketa Hartman on Sep 27, 2024
Grievance procedures and arbitration are both criticized for being excessively legal, formal, and reactive, rather than proactive in trying to find ways to decrease the likelihood of future disputes.
Grievance Procedures
Formal processes that allow employees to voice complaints or concerns regarding work conditions, treatment, or policies.
Arbitration
A process of dispute resolution in which an impartial third party, known as an arbitrator, makes a decision to resolve a dispute between two or more parties, often used as an alternative to litigation.
Excessively Legal
Refers to a situation or approach heavily reliant on legal frameworks or actions, often to an extreme or unnecessary degree.
- Acquire knowledge on the critical aspects and constituents of the grievance mechanism in labor contracts.
- Gain insight into the issues and criticisms faced by grievance mechanisms and arbitration processes.
Learning Objectives
- Acquire knowledge on the critical aspects and constituents of the grievance mechanism in labor contracts.
- Gain insight into the issues and criticisms faced by grievance mechanisms and arbitration processes.
Related questions
Nonunion Grievance Processes That End with a Peer Review as ...
The Traditional Approach to Dispute Resolution in Nonunionized Settings Has ...
An Ombudsperson Is a Neutral Person, Employed by the Company ...
Using the Court System Instead of a Formal Grievance Process ...
Traditional Grievance Procedures Are Criticized for Encouraging or Allowing Employees ...