Asked by Geneva Brems on May 29, 2024
Verified
Habitat Corporation, a U.S. firm, owns property in India. The government of India seizes the property for a proper public purpose and pays the firm just compensation. This is
A) confiscation.
B) the act of state doctrine.
C) the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
D) expropriation.
Just Compensation
The fair market value that must be paid for property taken by the government for public use, as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
Proper Public Purpose
Proper public purpose is a principle stating that governmental actions and the use of public resources must aim to benefit the general public or community as a whole.
Expropriation
The act of a government taking private property for public use, with compensation provided to the owner.
- Discern the differences between the practices of confiscation and expropriation under international law guidelines.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Discern the differences between the practices of confiscation and expropriation under international law guidelines.
Related questions
Assume a Foreign Nation Has Seized All of the Property ...
The US and the Government of San Sebastian Broke Off ...
Expropriation Is the Privilege of a Political Entity That Has ...
The CISG Specifically Excludes Sales of Which of the Following ...
Law That Pertains to a Particular Nation Is Called_____ Law ...