Asked by Logan Tippett on Apr 25, 2024

verifed

Verified

Harold and Dorothy own all of the shares of Ace Corporation.Robert,Ace's landlord,sued Ace for unpaid rent.Robert received a $10,000 judgment against Ace.When Robert tried to collect on the judgment,he discovered that Ace Corporation had no assets.He then discovered that Harold and Dorothy no longer operate Ace Corporation.They now operate Optimus Corporation as its only shareholders.Harold and Dorothy had no assets in their names.However,upon further investigation,Robert discovered that Optimus had numerous assets.He reviewed the financial documentation,discovering that Optimus pays for Harold and Dorothy's mortgage,medical bills,and grocery bills.Can a court pierce the corporate veil? Discuss.

Corporate Veil

A legal concept that separates the liability and actions of a corporation from its shareholders, protecting personal assets.

Shareholders

Individuals or entities that own shares in a corporation, granting them ownership interests and typically some level of influence over the corporation's decisions.

Judgment

A court's final determination of the rights and obligations of the parties in a case.

  • Attain knowledge on the subject of piercing the corporate veil and its repercussions.
verifed

Verified Answer

JA
Jaber AlSabah7 days ago
Final Answer :
In this situation,Harold and Dorothy appear to have formed a new corporation for the purpose of evading a creditor.Both parts of the requirements for piercing the corporate veil exist: domination by the shareholders (paying personal expenses)and using that domination for an improper purpose (evading personal creditors).