Asked by Brooke Huggins on May 06, 2024
Verified
How are the rules of validity different if we make modern assumptions about existential import than if we make traditional assumptions about existential import?
A) Only if we make modern assumptions do we need to consider distribution.
B) If we make modern assumptions, then we must add a rule to deal with existential import.
C) If we make traditional assumptions, then we must add a rule to deal with existential import.
D) Only if we make traditional assumptions do we need rules about negative propositions.
E) Only if we make modern assumptions do we need rules about negative propositions.
Existential Import
The implication that a statement makes about the existence of the subjects it mentions.
Modern Assumptions
Contemporary beliefs or presuppositions that influence one's perspective or argument, often taken for granted within a specific time period.
Traditional Assumptions
Established beliefs that are widely accepted without question or evidence.
- Discuss the influence of existential import on the appraisal of syllogistic validity.
Verified Answer
CH
Camryn HollandMay 09, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
If we make modern assumptions about existential import, we must add a rule to deal with existential import. Traditional logic assumes that universal statements imply the existence of the subject while modern logic allows for the possibility of a universal statement being true even if the subject does not exist. This difference requires an additional rule in modern logic to ensure valid reasoning.
Learning Objectives
- Discuss the influence of existential import on the appraisal of syllogistic validity.
Related questions
Using the Modern Rules of Validity, Find the Unstated Premise ...
If We Are Solving an Enthymeme and the Conclusion Is ...
Is the Following Syllogism Valid? No Internet Service Provider Is ...
How Many Rules of Validity Are There If We Adopt ...
Can Every Syllogism with a Missing Conclusion Be Completed in ...