Asked by Viviana Vergara on Jul 13, 2024
Verified
In Cordas v.Uber Technologies,Inc. ,the case in the text,the court held that:
A) Uber's terms and conditions constituted an enforceable browsewrap agreement.
B) Uber's arbitration clause was unenforceable because it did not require an affirmative assent from its users.
C) Uber's arbitration clause was enforceable because Cordas downloaded the app voluntarily.
D) Uber's arbitration clause was enforceable because Cordas affirmatively acknowledged it.
Browsewrap Agreement
A type of online contract that is assumed to be accepted by a user through the use of the website, without requiring explicit consent.
Arbitration Clause
A provision in a contract that requires the parties to resolve disputes through arbitration rather than through the court system.
Enforceable
Capable of being imposed or brought into effect legally, typically referring to contracts, agreements, or laws.
- Distinguish between varieties of online contracts and comprehend their legal validity.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Distinguish between varieties of online contracts and comprehend their legal validity.
Related questions
Janet Goes to an Electronics Store to Purchase Design Software ...
Global Dispatch Corporation and Heavy Hauling Inc ...
In the Opening Case Round 1,Sole Survivor Claimed It Could ...
Alice Uses an Electronic Shopping Cart on a Popular Website ...
The Provisions of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code ...