In the case in the text,Black v.William Insulation Co. ,the court held that:

A) WIC owed a duty to Black because it was aware of its employees' state of exhaustion and still required them work extensive hours and drive to and from the worksite.
B) WIC owed a duty to Black because the harm to Black's decedent was a foreseeable consequence of WIC's actions (or inactions) .
C) WIC did not owe a duty to Black because the decedent's injuries were not the "natural and probable consequence of" any acts of negligence by WIC in the course of Ibarra-Viernes's employment.
D) WIC did not owe a duty to Black under the impact test.