Asked by Braxton Terrazas on May 07, 2024

verifed

Verified

In which of these situations would the Coase theorem be MOST likely to work?

A) A thousand firms use a lake, there are no other users, all their costs could be reduced somewhat by polluting, but all would have lower water intake costs if the lake were clean.
B) A group of nine firms use a lake, there are no other users, all their costs could be reduced somewhat by polluting, but all would have lower water intake costs if the lake were clean.
C) Worldwide deep sea fishing rights need to be negotiated among thousands of fishermen from different countries.
D) One hundred and fifty nations need to come to an accord about CFC generation to combat ozone depletion.
E) A group of chemical firms high upstream on the Mississippi River have emissions that affect not only communities downstream along the river, but around the Gulf of Mexico as well.

Coase Theorem

Principle that when parties can bargain without cost and to their mutual advantage, the resulting outcome will be efficient regardless of how property rights are specified.

Externalities

Costs or benefits that affect parties who did not choose to incur those costs or benefits, often leading to market failures.

Polluting

The act of contaminating the environment with pollutants, such as chemicals, noise, or heat, that can harm organisms and the ecosystem.

  • Embrace the underlying principles of the Coase theorem and how it pertains to the settlement of pollution’s financial implications and gains.
verifed

Verified Answer

AE
Ashley EnríquezMay 14, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The Coase theorem is most likely to work when there are a small number of parties involved, as in situation B where only nine firms use the lake. This would make negotiations easier and a solution more feasible. In situation A, with a thousand firms, it would be much more difficult to coordinate negotiations and enforce agreements. Similarly, situation C involves a vast number of parties and countries, making negotiations more complicated. Situation D also involves many countries and would require a significant level of international cooperation. Situation E involves multiple communities and states, making negotiations more complex.