Asked by Kattelin Crocker on Jul 11, 2024
Verified
Jacques captured a large rattlesnake while on a camping trip and brought it home to his apartment in the city. He kept the snake in a glass aquarium which he had covered with a wire screen. One day, after feeding the snake, he accidentally failed to fasten down the screen cover, and the snake escaped from the aquarium. The snake managed to enter the adjoining apartment by way of an open balcony door. The occupant of the adjoining apartment was bitten and seriously injured when she accidentally stepped on the snake.
Historically, the courts have imposed strict liability for loss on persons that keep dangerous things on their property. The rattlesnake would probably be classed in such a way by the court.
Strict Liability
Legal responsibility for damages or injury even if the person found strictly liable was not at fault or negligent.
Rattlesnake
A venomous snake known for the distinctive rattle at the end of its tail, used as a warning signal.
Dangerous Things
Objects or conditions that present a significant risk of harm to people, property, or the environment.
- Elucidate the notion of strict liability as it pertains to the domain of tort law.
- Understand the application of negligence principles in unique circumstances (e.g., keeping dangerous animals, maintenance of property).
Verified Answer
RV
Rowall vasquezJul 17, 2024
Final Answer :
True
Explanation :
Historically, courts have indeed imposed strict liability on owners for damages or injuries caused by inherently dangerous animals or things they keep. A rattlesnake, being a venomous and dangerous animal, would likely be classified as such, making the owner strictly liable for injuries it causes.
Learning Objectives
- Elucidate the notion of strict liability as it pertains to the domain of tort law.
- Understand the application of negligence principles in unique circumstances (e.g., keeping dangerous animals, maintenance of property).