Asked by Tiffany Smith on Jun 11, 2024
Verified
Kendra owns a sporting goods store. She is in court because of a breach of contract lawsuit against her supplier. One of the terms of the contract is ambiguous. Would the court likely permit Kendra to testify as to oral conversations about the ambiguous terms of the contract?
A) Yes, but only to clarify the ambiguous contract terms.
B) No, because there is a written contract.
C) No, but she could provide additional writings.
D) No, because it would modify the contract.
E) Yes, where ambiguous terms exist, she may provide oral evidence that modifies the contract.
Parol Evidence Rule
A rule in contract law that prevents parties from presenting evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreements that would contradict the terms of a written contract.
Ambiguous Terms
Words or phrases in a contract or agreement that are unclear and open to more than one interpretation.
- Determine and expound upon the exceptions to the parol evidence rule.
Verified Answer
SP
shavonda payneJun 12, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
EWhen a contract contains ambiguous terms, courts often allow oral testimony to clarify those terms. This is known as the parol evidence rule exception, which permits the introduction of oral evidence to explain, clarify, or supplement the written contract without necessarily modifying its terms. Thus, both options that allow for oral testimony in the context of ambiguity are correct.
Learning Objectives
- Determine and expound upon the exceptions to the parol evidence rule.
Related questions
Regarding Damian's Assertion That Under the Parol Evidence Rule He ...
Which of the Following Is True About Contracts That Have ...
Which of the Following Is a False Statement Regarding the ...
When May a Court Rule That Parol Evidence Might Be ...
In Entering into Contracts for Services,customers Might Be Influenced by ...