Asked by Britanny Espinosa on Jun 03, 2024

verifed

Verified

Marketing Solutions Inc. promises to employ Niki as a software engineer. In reliance on the promise, Niki quits her job with Online Ad Agency, but Marketing Solutions does not hire her. Most likely, Marketing Solutions is

A) liable to Niki under the concept of rescission.
B) liable to Niki under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
C) liable to Niki under the preexisting duty rule.
D) not liable to Niki.

Promissory Estoppel

A legal principle that prevents a party from withdrawing a promise when the other party has relied upon it to their detriment.

Preexisting Duty

An obligation or duty that already exists under contract law and does not constitute valid consideration for a new agreement.

Rescission

The act of canceling, voiding, or annulling a contract, returning the parties to their positions prior to the contract.

  • Understand the legal consequences of deceptive promises and the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
verifed

Verified Answer

ZK
Zybrea KnightJun 04, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Marketing Solutions Inc. is most likely liable to Niki under the doctrine of promissory estoppel because Niki relied on their promise to her detriment by quitting her previous job, and the company failed to fulfill their promise.