Asked by Tiffany Lease on May 19, 2024
Verified
Naturalistic observation is less useful than other research methods for:
A) investigating complex social settings.
B) developing theories based on observation.
C) making observations in a natural setting over an extended period of time.
D) studying well-defined hypotheses under precisely specified conditions.
Studying Well-Defined Hypotheses
The process of rigorously investigating specific, clearly articulated, and testable propositions derived from theories.
Naturalistic Observation
A research method involving observing subjects in their natural environment without intervention or manipulation by the observer.
- Recognize the limitations of naturalistic and systematic observations in research.
Verified Answer
CS
Carlos SantanaMay 25, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
Naturalistic observation is less useful for studying well-defined hypotheses under precisely specified conditions. Other research methods, such as experiments, are better suited for testing specific hypotheses under controlled conditions.
Learning Objectives
- Recognize the limitations of naturalistic and systematic observations in research.
Related questions
To Understand the Criminal Mind, You Might Study One Criminal ...
Limitations Are the Weaknesses of Your Research, and They Are ...
A Researcher Codes the Nonverbal Behaviors of Married Couples While ...
A Researcher Plans to Study the Relationship Between People's Smoking ...
A Formal Prediction About the Relationship Between Two or More ...