Asked by Birajit Nepal on Apr 24, 2024

verifed

Verified

Phadke and Anandh argue for the view that the medical profession should reject commercial organ procurement on what grounds?

A) Commercial organ procurement exploits the poor.
B) Commercial organ procurement commercializes the body.
C) Commercial organ procurement exploits the poor, commercializes the body, and undercuts human dignity.
D) Commercial organ procurement exploits the poor and undercuts human dignity.

Commercial Organ Procurement

The practice of buying and selling organs for transplantation, often criticized for ethical concerns, including exploitation and inequity in access to transplant surgeries.

Human Dignity

The inherent worth of all individuals, demanding respect and ethical treatment in all circumstances.

Anandh

Likely referring to the same individual previously mentioned, potentially a scholar or researcher with contributions in a specific field of study, though the lack of context prevents a precise definition.

  • Understand the ethical arguments against commercial organ procurement and the principles that support a non-commercialized approach to organ donation.
verifed

Verified Answer

RB
Roopi Bisnauth7 days ago
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
Phadke and Anandh argue that commercial organ procurement is problematic because it exploits the poor, commercializes the body, and undercuts human dignity. This is because it creates a market for organs, turning them into commodities that can be bought and sold, which devalues the human body and reduces people to mere objects for economic gain. Furthermore, commercial organ procurement disproportionately affects those who are economically disadvantaged or marginalized, leading to exploitation and further inequities. Therefore, they argue that the medical profession should reject commercial organ procurement and instead focus on promoting ethical, non-commercial alternatives for organ donation.