Asked by Theodora Olympia on May 07, 2024
Verified
Russell,45,has been suffering from a mental impairment for a long time.He signs a contract to sell his villa for $1 million to Andre.When Russell's wife Katie,who is also his court-appointed guardian,gets to know of the deal,she wants to ends the contract.Which of the following statements is true?
A) Andre cannot claim the villa until he has paid for it.
B) Russell has the right to enter into such a contract.
C) Katie need not worry because the contract is void.
D) The court will give primary preference to Russell's opinion.
Mental Impairment
A condition that limits a person's intellectual functioning or emotional wellbeing.
Void
A term describing a contract or legal agreement that has no legal force or effect, making it unenforceable by law.
Court-appointed Guardian
An individual assigned by a court to make legal decisions for another person who is unable to make those decisions themselves, typically due to age or incapacity.
- Differentiate among contracts that are null, voidable, and enforceable with respect to mental capacity and the impact of intoxication.
- Understand the role and implications of a court-adjudicated mental incompetency on contract formation and enforcement.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Differentiate among contracts that are null, voidable, and enforceable with respect to mental capacity and the impact of intoxication.
- Understand the role and implications of a court-adjudicated mental incompetency on contract formation and enforcement.
Related questions
________ Is a Ground for Lack of Capacity Only When ...
Which of the Following Characterizes the Effect of Incapacity Caused ...
In January 2002,a Court with the Necessary Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Holds ...
Which of the Following Is True of Contracts Involving People ...
Three Days Before She Was Judicially Declared Mentally Incompetent and ...