Asked by Keandra Moffitt on May 31, 2024
Verified
Rye agrees to sell his Taco Delight restaurant to Sati. The parties intend their written contract to be a final statement of the terms of their agreement. Later, the parties dispute some of the provisions. In litigation, Sati offers evidence to contradict the written terms. Most likely, the court will
A) exclude the evidence.
B) reform the written terms to match the evidence.
C) strike a balance between the evidence and the written terms.
D) dismiss the case.
Written Contract
A formal agreement between parties that is expressed in written form and is legally binding.
Exclude Evidence
A legal process to prevent certain information or materials from being presented in court, often due to irrelevance or violation of rules.
Final Statement
The conclusive summary or account statement that represents the last in a series, detailing final balances or outcomes.
- Know the legal implications of intended final written statements in contracts.
- Understand the role and limitations of the parol evidence rule in contract disputes.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Know the legal implications of intended final written statements in contracts.
- Understand the role and limitations of the parol evidence rule in contract disputes.
Related questions
The Parol Evidence Rule Applies Only to Integrated Contracts, Meaning ...
The Word Parol Literally Means Release
Bernadette Contracts in Writing to Sell Emily a Flatbed Trailer ...
Catherine and Jacob Have a Written Contract to Buy and ...
McDougal Construction and Espinosa Entered a Contract to Build the ...