Asked by Alina Moloko on Jun 14, 2024
Verified
The 1896 critical election
A) saw elite democratic principles triumph over popular democratic hopes.
B) encouraged big business interests to accommodate the concerns of small farmers.
C) spurred large numbers of city dwellers to vote Democratic.
D) began to erode the Democrats' "solid South."
1896 Critical Election
A pivotal United States presidential election that realigned party systems and marked a major shift in political attitudes and approaches.
Solid South
A term used to describe the electoral support of the Southern United States for Democratic Party candidates from the end of Reconstruction until the mid-20th century.
- Explain the concept of critical (realigning) elections and their consequences on the political terrain.
- Recognize and comprehend the various party systems in the history of the United States.
Verified Answer
SA
sandeep aluruJun 16, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
The 1896 critical election is often seen as a victory for elite democratic principles, represented by William McKinley and the Republican Party, over the popular democratic hopes embodied by William Jennings Bryan and the Populist movement. This election solidified the power of industrial interests and marked a setback for those advocating for the concerns of small farmers and the working class.
Learning Objectives
- Explain the concept of critical (realigning) elections and their consequences on the political terrain.
- Recognize and comprehend the various party systems in the history of the United States.
Related questions
What Were the Differences Between the System of 1896 and ...
Using the 2004 and 2012 Red-Blue Presidential Election Maps, Explain ...
What Is the Difference Between Single-Member (Winner-Take-All)electoral System and Proportional ...
The Effects of Critical Elections ...
Which of the Following Is NOT a Characteristic of a ...