Asked by Hannah Gutzmer on Jul 02, 2024

verifed

Verified

The argument against a shareholder model and in favor of a stakeholder model rests in part on the notion that:

A) Corporations are legally sanctioned by the government and thus the rights of shareholders are not unlimited.
B) According to utilitarian ethics, managers have a moral obligation to consider all perspectives.
C) According to libertarian ethics, managers must preserve the freedom of all stakeholders in their decision-making.
D) A focus on short-term profits will, in the long run, maximize utility in society .

Stakeholder Model

A theory of organizational management that emphasizes the importance of considering the interests of all stakeholders in decision-making processes.

Shareholder Model

focuses on maximizing value for shareholders as the paramount objective of a company, often at the expense of other stakeholders.

Utilitarian Ethics

An ethical theory that posits the best action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or utility, considering the greater good for the greatest number of people.

  • Gain an understanding of the essential principles behind shareholder and stakeholder models in corporate governance.
  • Understand the moral considerations in balancing the maximization of shareholder value with the interests of stakeholders.
verifed

Verified Answer

SS
sienna stephanJul 03, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
The argument against a shareholder model and in favor of a stakeholder model rests on the idea that a corporation, being a legally sanctioned entity, does not have unlimited rights for shareholders. This implies that corporations cannot be solely focused on maximizing shareholder value and must consider the interests of all stakeholders. The idea that a corporation is a legal entity created by the government supports the stakeholder model as it implies that the corporation exists to serve a larger social purpose beyond just shareholder value.