The bank president has issued a new order: No personal effects should be displayed on any worker's desk or workspace walls.Argue against this edict by stressing the beneficial functions of territoriality.

As an employee, I strongly disagree with the bank president's new order to ban personal effects from our desks and workspace walls. This edict goes against the beneficial functions of territoriality in the workplace.

First and foremost, personal effects on our desks and walls serve as a form of self-expression and identity. They allow us to create a personalized and comfortable work environment, which can have a positive impact on our overall well-being and productivity. By removing personal items, the president is essentially stripping us of our ability to create a space that feels like our own.

Additionally, territoriality in the workplace can also foster a sense of ownership and pride in our work. When we are able to personalize our workspace, we are more likely to feel a sense of ownership over our tasks and responsibilities. This can lead to increased motivation and a stronger commitment to our work.

Furthermore, personal effects can also serve as conversation starters and icebreakers with colleagues and clients. They can help to build rapport and create a more welcoming and friendly atmosphere in the office. By banning personal items, the president is essentially stifling opportunities for connection and collaboration among employees.

In conclusion, the ban on personal effects in the workplace goes against the beneficial functions of territoriality. It hinders our ability to express ourselves, create a sense of ownership, and build connections with others. I urge the bank president to reconsider this edict and recognize the importance of allowing employees to personalize their workspaces.