Asked by Lauren Clark on Sep 22, 2024

verifed

Verified

The California Supreme Court ruled that the therapists at the University of California, Berkeley, were not negligent in failing to warn Tatiana Tarasoff that one of her patients had threatened Tarasoff because a therapist has an absolute duty to protect her patient's confidentiality.

Tarasoff

Refers to a legal case and resulting rule that mental health professionals have a duty to warn identifiable individuals if their client poses a serious risk of harm to them.

Patient's Confidentiality

The ethical and legal duty of healthcare providers to protect personal health information of patients from unauthorized disclosure.

Absolute Duty

An unconditional obligation that must be performed regardless of the circumstances.

  • Understand the ethical considerations and legal responsibilities in physician-patient confidentiality.
verifed

Verified Answer

BP
brianna ponce2 days ago
Final Answer :
False
Explanation :
The California Supreme Court actually ruled in 1976 that the therapists at the University of California, Berkeley, had a duty to protect Tarasoff from the dangerous behavior of their patient and that they were negligent in not warning her of the specific threat. The court recognized that the therapist's duty to protect potential victims takes precedence over their duty to maintain the confidentiality of their patient's information. This case established the legal precedent known as the Tarasoff duty to warn, which requires mental health professionals to take reasonable steps to protect individuals who are threatened by their clients.