Asked by Amber Thomas on Jun 14, 2024
Verified
The Supreme Court ruled that the government could not restrict independent expenditures by corporations or unions to political campaigns in
A) Buckley v.Valeo (1976) .
B) Bush v.Gore (2000) .
C) Citizens United v.Federal Election Commission (2010) .
D) FCC v.Pacifica Foundation (1978) .
Independent Expenditures
Money spent by individuals or organizations to support or oppose political candidates or issues without coordination with the candidates or their campaigns.
Political Campaigns
Organized efforts to influence the decision-making process within a specific group, often associated with candidates running for political office.
- Grasp the legal landscape of campaign finance in the United States, including key Supreme Court decisions.
Verified Answer
AM
Abdul Manan JalbaniJun 17, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
The Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) that the government could not restrict independent expenditures by corporations or unions to political campaigns. This decision overturned provisions of the McCain-Feingold Act that prohibited such spending by corporations and unions within 30 days of a primary election and 60 days of a general election. The ruling was based on the First Amendment's protection of free speech and has had significant implications for campaign finance laws and the role of money in politics.
Learning Objectives
- Grasp the legal landscape of campaign finance in the United States, including key Supreme Court decisions.
Related questions
How Did the Citizens United Court Ruling Affect Campaign Expenditures
The Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Citizens United V ...
What Did the Supreme Court Rule About Independent Expenditures
Individuals and Organizations Can Give an Unlimited Amount of Money ...
There Were Approximately ________ in Independent Expenditures in the 2016 ...