Asked by Asielle Kaimari on Jul 27, 2024
Verified
The two justifications for punishment which assume that offenders deserve to be punished are ______.
A) incapacitation and rehabilitation
B) retribution and just deserts
C) individual and general deterrence
D) incapacitation and just deserts
Just Deserts
The concept of receiving a punishment or reward that is rightfully deserved.
Incapacitation
The state of being disabled or deprived of legal power or physical capabilities.
Retribution
A principle of justice that advocates for punishment to be proportional to the crime, serving as a form of moral vengeance.
- Contrast the concepts of retributive (past-focused) and preventive (future-focused) punishment theories.
- Detect and assess the hurdles and disparagements related to the execution of varied punishment theories.
Verified Answer
JM
Jessica MikrutJul 31, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The two justifications for punishment that assume that offenders deserve to be punished are retribution and just deserts. Retribution asserts that offenders should be punished because they deserve to suffer for their wrongdoing, while just deserts theory argues that the severity of the punishment should be proportionate to the seriousness of the crime committed.
Learning Objectives
- Contrast the concepts of retributive (past-focused) and preventive (future-focused) punishment theories.
- Detect and assess the hurdles and disparagements related to the execution of varied punishment theories.
Related questions
The Article That Contributed to the Demise of Rehabilitation Argued ...
Theories That Set the Goal of Punishment as the Prevention ...
There Is Little Agreement Among Researchers That Punishment Has a ...
Which of the Following Is a Problem with Communicative Theory ...
Which of the Following Is Not a Problem Inherent in ...