Asked by Olivia Gullett on May 09, 2024
Verified
Those who oppose the death penalty respond to the supporters' argument that it is justified by retribution by stating that ______ is sufficiently retributive.
A) the prosecution process
B) a life sentence
C) a criminal conviction
D) the court
Sufficiently Retributive
Adequately punishing or taking vengeance for wrongdoing in a manner that is considered just.
Life Sentence
A prison sentence that keeps the convicted individual incarcerated for the rest of their life, often without the possibility of parole.
- Differentiate among various philosophies of punishment and their consequences for sentencing decisions.
Verified Answer
MM
mariama mohamedMay 14, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Opponents of the death penalty argue that a life sentence without the possibility of parole is a sufficient punishment for the most heinous crimes. They argue that it still allows for the criminal to be held accountable for their actions while giving them the opportunity for rehabilitation and the possibility of making amends for their crimes. They also argue that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent and that there is always the possibility of executing an innocent person. Therefore, a life sentence is the most appropriate way to balance justice and morality, without resorting to state-sponsored killing.
Learning Objectives
- Differentiate among various philosophies of punishment and their consequences for sentencing decisions.
Related questions
What Form of Punishment Is Clearly the Preeminent Morality Issue ...
In Theory,three-Strikes Legislation Is Meant to Target ______ and Dangerous ...
Which of the Following Is True of the Consequences Approach ...
How Are Consequences Different from Punishment ...
How Do Natural Consequences Differ from Logical Consequences ...