Asked by Brian Metroz on May 05, 2024
Verified
What did the court rule on appeal in Alfonso Candela v.Port Motors,Inc.,the case in the textbook in which the plaintiff sued the defendant for breach of warranty of title,claiming that he was sold a stolen car?
A) That the defendant passed good title as long as the defendant did not know that the car was stolen.
B) That the defendant passed voidable title as long as the defendant did not know that the car was stolen.
C) That a defendant selling stolen goods,regardless of good faith,can never pass a voidable or good title to the buyer.
D) That a defendant selling stolen goods can pass good title to a buyer as long as the buyer and seller were innocent and not in collusion.
E) That a defendant selling stolen goods does not pass good title,but the risk of loss is on the buyer.
Warranty of Title
A guarantee by a seller to a buyer that the seller has the right to sell the property and that there are no undisclosed liens or encumbrances against it.
Stolen Car
A vehicle that has been taken without the owner's consent, often leading to criminal charges against the person in possession.
Breach of Warranty
The failure to fulfill the terms of a promise or guarantee made about the quality or condition of a product or service.
- Understand the implementation of common law and Uniform Commercial Code regulations in sales agreements, covering the principles of insurable interest and unconscionability.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Understand the implementation of common law and Uniform Commercial Code regulations in sales agreements, covering the principles of insurable interest and unconscionability.
Related questions
Which of the Following Is True Regarding the Mirror-Image Rule ...
When a Seller Transfers Goods to a Buyer,and If the ...
Under the Uniform Commercial Code,contracts for the Sale of Goods ...
What Actions Does the Uniform Commercial Code Allow a Court ...
An Insurable Interest Is the Right to Insure the Goods ...